Commission: Ms Marvel nude
A nude commission of Ms Marvel. Check my commission rates.
Update: It seems that, predictably, Social justice warriors are butthurt about my Hugo awards nomination and, as they try to find anything to attack me, they have targeted this drawing, accusing me of doing Child pornography, or of “pedophilia”, because aparently the character must be 16 in one of it’s versions (something i didn’t even know, but that’s beyond the point) and want me to remove the drawing.
Since i’m a sane person who doesn’t go to Tumblr, my first, short, and concise reaction about those claims and petition is: Fuck you. I’m not removing shit. I’m not gona censor myself because you got offended.
Instead, i’ll be lecturing them in some dosis of reality. Because they very much need it.
So, we have a drawing of a character with an adult body, whos just standing still while half naked. Calling the reactions i’ve seen “overreactions” would be a compliment, as is tremendusly tame, and the internet is full to the head of erotic or hentai drawings of anime characters of 16-17 years old.
First of, this is a DRAWING. You know, those things that are done with pencils and colors and stuff? like, you know, without absolutely no participation or harm of any real person? yes, that, you got it. So, a drawing is NOT child pornography. It’s NOT REAL, ok? it’s just a combination of lines placed in an specific way by an artist, not an actual person doing anything. Even if i actually drawed a little children having sex (which i have not), it would still not be child pornography, as no real person has done, or been done, anything. Drawings of characters of any age are legal in almost all the countries in the world, and Spain is one of them. Sucks to be you, Canada.
Secondly, calling a developed body of an anime style drawing of a 16 years old “pedophilia” is like the most retarded thing anyone can ever say. Pedophilia is the attraction for underdeveloped bodies, for children who have not yet passed puberty. Pedophilia is not the “number”. A pedophile is not someone who feels attraction for a woman with the body of Scarlett johanson who happens to be 17 years and 360 days. It’s someone who feels attracted by someone with an 8 years old body. What, do you think that pedophiles feel nothing when they look to a child and then someone says “oh, and she/he has 8 years old” and then suddenly they have an erection? do you think they get erections looking at the number 8 or something? bullshit.
“Pedophilia” would be feeling attracted to a drawing of an 8 years old who is clearly visualy depicted as an 8 years old. Now look at how my characters (or any anime character, since i see this accusation being throwed a lot by SJWs about anime) are drawed. They have adult, attractive, developed bodies. Even if a character has “16”, it’s drawn with an adult body. That’s NOT pedophilia. You cannot look at characters like the ones in Dead or alive and say it’s pedophilia because some of them are 16. That’s simply retarded. (fuck, they even use the same body bases for many of them, they just change the age in the character description). And the same for my drawings. You cannot look at a drawing like this and say it’s pedophilia because she technicaly has 16 in the original comic. Specialy because i didn’t know her age, and just drawed a body of about 20 years old! don’t you see how ridiculous this is? if i say “it’s ms.marvel when she grows to 20 years old” it’s suddenly ok?
And third, imaginary characters have no “age”. The age of a fictional character is just a number put there by the creator. It means nothing. You can as well say she has 14 or 30 depending on the drawing style. Do you want me to show some examples to see how ridiculous you sound? look closely:
-The “kid” in the far right side of this image has 27 years old. Not pedophilia by SJW standards. The blue hair girl in middle has 1 year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards. The guy at the far left has 8.000 years old. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPT3UPWYAEgLc4.jpg:large
-She (later he) has one year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPVA2xWYAQImxx.jpg:large
-One year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c7/35/95/c7359503bf32cd8bd5e0871d07a96a02.jpg
-Hes 17. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPYPNQW0AAKY7n.jpg:large
-All the characters in this image are over 18. Faping to the little one is not pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUF62WIAA3FKR.jpg:large
-This characters go to university. Masturbating to the little blonde one is not pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUA86W0AIE_UP.jpg:large
-This character has 3 years old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUabsWkAARg8E.jpg:large
-Sarah Nyberg, not pedophile by SJW standards.
But wait, i can complicate things a little more!
-This is a 10 years old girl who has possessed the body of a 38 years old woman who, due to her powers, stoped aging at 20…so…pedophilia?…not pedophilia?… http://i.blogs.es/357936/3rd-brithday-000/original.jpg
-And what about Real life series of school life? the actors for those roles are usually 20+ or even 30, but in the series they are suposedly 16-17. So, if you like them you are a pedophile?
-If i just say that a drawing is “the character if she had 18 years old” then it would be ok, even if i drawed her exactly the same as the original 18 version?
Don’t worry because i can simplify all this: What’s important is the body. Being attracted to developed, past puberty, adult bodies is completely normal, regardless of the “number” the artist decides to write in the character profile. That’s why there are so many anime characters that people are attracted to even if they are technicaly 16 (which, btw, is the age of consent for japan, spain, and many other places), because their bodies are drawn so adult that they can be any range between 16-30, or even 14 if you want to go to Evangelion. And for fucks sake look at this image: http://k39.kn3.net/taringa/2/1/1/4/2/3/20/cyan_miku/862.jpg?2207
Discussion (50) ¬
This girl is only 16 right? If so, take it down.
she is 6
She is 6? please tell me you’re being sarcastic.
She was commissioned by Sarah Nyberg
Be serious, Is she underage or overage?
Age of consent in germany is 14 uwu
I have no fucking idea
It’s a drawing of a fictional character with supernatural abilities. She could be 16, 116, or 16e9.
Does it really matter?
If you can’t tell by looking, then why does it matter? It’s not a real person you know.
That’s the most amazing part. I drew a body similar to the image reference they sent me, which is a body arround 18-20 years. The only reason this people say she’s 16 it’s because they have read it in the accusation. If they just watched the drawing without knowing her age they would not think she’s 16.
It seems people is seriously believing that Sarah nyberg commissioned this. This was obviously a joke. Or i thought it was obvious :p
What about a character who is not human and below the age of 18 in human years and is drawn sexually explicit is it considered child porography because essential ms marvel is alien, half alien
What about a character who is not human and below the age of 18 in human years and is drawn sexually explicit is it considered child porography because essential ms marvel is alien, half alien
“Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.”
~ https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography
As this is a fictional character, it doesn’t count as child porn, no matter the age.
http://www.eruditorumpress.com/blog/vox-day-put-a-child-pornographer-on-the-hugo-ballot/ Congratulations, you riled up a guy so hard he wrote an essay about you.
Send him my reply, it’s in this drawing description XD
By Phil Sandifer. Yes, the very same goony beard man who vigorously defended Butts back when buttblasting took place over at Breitbart.
Perhaps someone should let Milo know ;]
‘Accusing scifi fandoms of harboring pedofiles’ I know I shouldnt believ this bollocks but what do the mean with that? Did you accuse other artists of making art for pedofiles, is there a longer story behind it or are they making this up?
Found the pedo!
Beware selfie stix and bankers.
Found the shitdick liberal who should be gutted and made into a toilet seat in the soon-to-come US Concentration camps
To be honest with you. When we’re speaking of fictional entities I don’t think the body or the age even matters. No one is going to be hurt by people jacking it to something which doesn’t exist. Just as no one is going to be hurt when hundreds of thousands of characters of varying ages are killed in any fictional material.
Precisely. No one has ever been murdered by a movie, and no one has ever been raped by a book — or by a drawing, for that matter.
I’m glad we sorted this out before I had a crisis of conscience over all the people I’ve murdered in GTA and Battlefield over the last 10 years.
Honestly I don’t think Kukuryo should have given such a long response to these stupid claims. He should have just drawn a stick figure, labeled it “5 years old” and said “I’m sorry this turns you on Sarah Nyberg”.
I may still do so XD
THIS BLOG IS BEING BRIGADED
Don’t take this down. Artwork is NOT child pornography by any standard. This drawing is NOT illegal and is protected by the 1st Amendment of the United States of America. The feds might want you to think otherwise but they can go fuck themselves. Laws guide us, right? Good, so fuck the feds and the SJWs and keep fighting the good fight. They can and will go to hell. Peace.
Thank you for being a voice of reason, Kukuruyo.
I’m sorry for all the shit you’re dealing with from people that obviously have trouble seperating fiction and reality. Not all that surprising, I suppose, considering this is likely the same crowd that believes video games can turn people into violent misogynists.
To those that want to censor and police art: fuck off. No one is making you view this. Just close the browser window if it offends you (also, you are utterly pathetic if this offends you). Whether the fictional character being drawn is 18, 16, 9, or 9000 years old makes no difference because they’re not real. They have no rights. There has been no crime, and there are no victims. Your dislike of a piece of artwork is nothing more than a matter of personal taste. I’m sorry your taste is shit.
Yeah, it seems that many of today’s problems with videogames come from people who can’t diferenciate reality from fiction. They seem to think that everything that happens in a fictional world is 100% the same as real life, and thus sexuality is wrong, killing a woman is wrong, etc.
Lewd drawing: WRONG
Salon article defending pedophilia and saying it’s an alternative lifestyle: A-OK!
SJWs are retarded.
Ah, that’s why the image doesn’t load. Yes, sucks to be Canadian at times.
Trust me, you’re happier that way.
You should probably rephrase your argument with a less offensive slang. Aren’t you a professional artist? Reading the above makes it a little tough to take you seriously.
I don’t care to be offensive. I care to be clear.
It’s one thing that you keep playing with underage characters like the degenerate you are, but the fact that you keep labeling your diarrhea leakage on canvas as “art” is the most offensive thing out of all this.
You all need help, and some art classes, cause this shit is Top tier fugly.
Get triggered! https://www.kukuruyo.com/2016/04/14/ksara-europa-monster-girls-shower-time/
lol kukuruyo is great
You probably aren’t a big fan of Japan then. Trust me, this is bog-standard over there! Just that most of the real drek doesn’t reach our shores. Try Marchen Awakens Romance for instance.
As a teenager…if I would have had a pc in my youth…I would have went out of my way to look for Rule 34 stuff. lol. I love it how when people bring up the “Must protect the children!” complaint they try to awkwardly lump in teens with that as if teens and little kids are exactly the same thing. Fears of parents withstanding, teens “are” sexual and have their own sexual agency. This and I’m very sure when a comic book artist draws Star Fire,Raven,or X-23 they deliberately made such characters attractive to both teens and adults. It’s just good for moving issues.
Don’t get me wrong,there are some great over-weight or otherwise not traditionally attractive characters I like a lot. (Like Amanda Waller who is so tough she can even keep the justice league in check) but “sexy skin” still greases palms with cash. We’re biological beings and we like depictions of biology in motion! (especially if it’s sexy!)
Regardless,these are drawings,not “real acts” effecting real people. I mean I’m not particularly fond of goro (violent snuff porn) or xxx-rated lolicon BUT if it satiates the dark desires of some ppl out there so they do not end up committing “real crimes” I’m fine with it existing even if I disapprove. Studies even show that hobbies such as video games, drawing,writing, & table-top role-playing that give us the ability to somehow “act out” sexual or violence related fantasies reduce the rates of real criminal activity overall. Just food for thought.
Excellent reply to the SJW’s.
“and the internet is full to the head of erotic or hentai drawings of anime characters of 16-17 years old.”
Ha!ha! More like 12-17 (with ages on either side of this, of course, topping out around 40-ish from what I’m told). 😉
This picture sucks either way.
don’t worry so much about the opinions of the hopelessly ignorant, dude. no one with half a brain equates a drawing with real life anyway so keep doing what you do
I don’t really worry about the opinions, i worry about the campaigns they do to take peoples income down, cause it worked with me :p
It makes no sense that people think they have the moral high ground by preaching against porn of fictional kids. If they had their way, teenagers wouldn’t be able to look at any fictional porn of characters young enough for them to legally be involved with if they were real people.
If they had their way, child rapists & people who drew Shantae naked in the privacy of her own bathtub (even though she canonically doesn’t have one) would both be sent to prison which means pedophiles who are evil enough to rape kids would be far less motivated to refrain from doing it. Because they’d no longer have a way to get off without risk of being sent to prison.
Unless they’re also attracted to adults. But, as a person who’s attracted to men & women but couldn’t replace one with the other, I’m gonna guess that, if you’re into kids & adults, replacing kids with adults isn’t gonna solve your problem. Think of it this way. Do you like sour food? If so, would you enjoy eating only sour food for the rest of your life even if you don’t like it all that much? Do you like video games? Would you enjoy entertaining yourself exclusively by playing video games for the rest of your life even if you don’t like it all that much?
I get why some people find the idea of someone masturbating to a kid disturbing even if it’s a fictional kid but you can’t deny that there’s no victim. A pure evil pedophile will have no moral qualms about raping kids but a lot of them will be afraid to do it because they don’t wanna go to prison so they’ll use fictional porn to get off so they don’t get arrested. Take away the fictional porn & that person is probably gonna start raping kids.
Besides, what about people who are exclusively attracted to kids but keep it to themselves because they don’t wanna victimize anyone? How is it not ok for them to look at fictional porn to get off the only way they can. And here’s something you probably never thought of before.
If there was no porn of fictional kids, pedophiles wouldn’t become accustomed to imagining cartoon characters naked. So, instead, they’d be imagining real kids naked. Whether they want to imagine it or not. Because imagination is largely involuntary. Isn’t that thought a lot more disturbing than the idea that someone out there has masturbated to Sailor Moon?
Also, why is it ok for Connie from Steven universe to canonically fight alien soldiers at the age of 14 but not ok for her to noncanonically have sex with her boyfriend who’s the same age as her? Why is it ok for a kid (played by a real child actor) in Dexter (a live action show) to be skinned alive but not ok for Shazam to be naked (regardless of his current form) while he’s in the process of changing clothes in the privacy of his own bedroom?
Why is it ok for child rape to be the subjective of a movie with actual child actors but not ok for a fictional kid’s private masturbation to be the subject of a picture on the internet?
Apparently, if someone animates a little girl walking outside naked, trying to show off how not embarrassed she is, & then running back inside even though there was no one out there to see her, it’s evil child porn but the scene where the Powerpuff girls are naked in the tub & are jumping so high we should logically be seeing their crotches & nipples is ok because the artist didn’t draw their nipples & crotches even though no one has a problem with seeing Ed, Edd, & Eddy’s nipples.
Basically drawings doesn’t affect anyones rights cause no one real is affected XD
Jesus Christ had said that all adulterers will go to hell if they don’t repent and stop lusting after people and having them lust after Jesus Christ had died to save human sinners.